Our goal is to ensure that all submitted manuscripts are evaluated fairly, thoroughly, and without bias, maintaining the highest standards of scientific quality and integrity.
All submissions undergo a double-blind review, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other. This ensures impartial evaluation based solely on the content of the manuscript.
Reviewers are selected based on their expertise relevant to the manuscript’s topic. Conflicts of interest are carefully avoided to ensure unbiased feedback.
Reviewers assess manuscripts for:
Based on reviewer comments, the editorial team makes a decision: accept, request revisions, or reject. Authors receive constructive feedback to help improve the manuscript, even if it is not accepted.
We aim to complete the review process efficiently, respecting authors’ time while maintaining thorough evaluation. Typical review duration is clearly communicated on the submission portal.